
Apresentando o Composer 2.5
Uma melhoria substancial em inteligência e comportamento em relação ao Composer 2, especialmente em tarefas agênticas de horizonte longo.
Our most powerful coding model. Built for long-running agents at a fraction of frontier cost.

Uma melhoria substancial em inteligência e comportamento em relação ao Composer 2, especialmente em tarefas agênticas de horizonte longo.

Como o autoinstall do Composer inicializa ambientes de RL prontos para execução usando versões anteriores do modelo para automatizar a configuração e a verificação.

Publicamos um relatório no arXiv sobre o treinamento do Composer 2 — do pré-treinamento contínuo no Kimi K2.5 ao RL em grande escala em sessões realistas do Cursor — além de CursorBench, benchmarks públicos e infraestrutura.
Aplicamos aprendizado por reforço online ao Composer, disponibilizando checkpoints do modelo em produção e usando interações reais dos usuários como sinais de recompensa para entregar um checkpoint aprimorado várias vezes por dia.
Composer 2.5 pairs frontier-level intelligence with low token cost. It's strong default for every day planning, design, and development work.
With improved effort calibration, Composer 2.5 adjusts how much work it spends based on the complexity of the task. It pushes harder on long-running problems and responds quickly to simpler ones. Popular use cases include:
Composer 2.5 keeps pace with interactive sessions. The fast variant returns edits and tool results quickly, so you stay in a tight feedback loop while it handles file edits, terminal commands, and multi-file changes directly in Cursor.
Trained with reinforcement learning on long-horizon coding tasks, Composer 2.5 sustains effort across extended work. It follows complex instructions reliably, picks the right tools, and stays on the goal through hundreds of tool calls without losing track.
At $0.50/M input and $2.50/M output tokens, Composer 2.5 makes frequent, large-scale use practical. Run it across many sessions, batch routine changes, or power background agents while keeping spend low.
| Composer 2.5 | Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.5 | Composer 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 69.3% | 69.4% | 82.7% | 61.7% |
| SWE-Bench Multilingual | 79.8% | 80.5% | 77.8% | 73.7% |
| CursorBench v3.1 (harder tasks) | 63.2% | 64.8% max61.6% xhigh (default) | 64.3% xhigh59.2% medium (default) | 52.2% |
Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 use self-reported scores for public evals.
(Above) Composer 2.5 offers frontier-level coding at a fraction of the latency when compared to Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 across Terminal-Bench, SWE-Bench, and CursorBench.
“With Composer 2.5, Cursor gives us the most cost-competitive model at the frontier of intelligence.”

“For businesses moving from tokenmaxxing to valuemaxxing, Composer 2.5 could not have come at a better time.”

“Been driving Composer 2.5 for like 3 hours straight and absolutely holy smokes, it is so freaking good!”

“Cursor's new Composer 2.5 takes third on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index and is ~10-60x lower cost than the higher-effort Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 variants above it.This release puts Composer among the leading coding agent models.”

“Continuing to test, test, and test some more with Composer 2.5, and I'm getting more and more impressed with each test run.The planning mode really continues to impress me, it is better than Opus 4.7 at planning imo, while being both faster, and using a fraction of the tokens.”

“Cursor with Composer 2.5 is very cheap and strong: around 8× cheaper than Claude Code and Codex, and scores higher than open-weight models!”

Composer 2.5 is built on the same open-source checkpoint as Composer 2, Moonshot's Kimi K2.5.
Together with SpaceXAI, we're training a significantly larger model from scratch, using 10x more total compute. With Colossus 2's million H100-equivalents and our combined data and training techniques, we expect this to be a major leap in model capability.
(Above) Composer 2.5 is built on an open base with proprietary intelligence: 85% of its compute goes into additional training and RL, rapidly improving its speed, efficiency, and coding abilities.
Our most powerful coding model. Built for long-running agents at a fraction of frontier cost.

Uma melhoria substancial em inteligência e comportamento em relação ao Composer 2, especialmente em tarefas agênticas de horizonte longo.

Como o autoinstall do Composer inicializa ambientes de RL prontos para execução usando versões anteriores do modelo para automatizar a configuração e a verificação.

Publicamos um relatório no arXiv sobre o treinamento do Composer 2 — do pré-treinamento contínuo no Kimi K2.5 ao RL em grande escala em sessões realistas do Cursor — além de CursorBench, benchmarks públicos e infraestrutura.
Aplicamos aprendizado por reforço online ao Composer, disponibilizando checkpoints do modelo em produção e usando interações reais dos usuários como sinais de recompensa para entregar um checkpoint aprimorado várias vezes por dia.
Composer 2.5 pairs frontier-level intelligence with low token cost. It's strong default for every day planning, design, and development work.
With improved effort calibration, Composer 2.5 adjusts how much work it spends based on the complexity of the task. It pushes harder on long-running problems and responds quickly to simpler ones. Popular use cases include:
Composer 2.5 keeps pace with interactive sessions. The fast variant returns edits and tool results quickly, so you stay in a tight feedback loop while it handles file edits, terminal commands, and multi-file changes directly in Cursor.
Trained with reinforcement learning on long-horizon coding tasks, Composer 2.5 sustains effort across extended work. It follows complex instructions reliably, picks the right tools, and stays on the goal through hundreds of tool calls without losing track.
At $0.50/M input and $2.50/M output tokens, Composer 2.5 makes frequent, large-scale use practical. Run it across many sessions, batch routine changes, or power background agents while keeping spend low.
| Composer 2.5 | Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.5 | Composer 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 69.3% | 69.4% | 82.7% | 61.7% |
| SWE-Bench Multilingual | 79.8% | 80.5% | 77.8% | 73.7% |
| CursorBench v3.1 (harder tasks) | 63.2% | 64.8% max61.6% xhigh (default) | 64.3% xhigh59.2% medium (default) | 52.2% |
Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 use self-reported scores for public evals.
(Above) Composer 2.5 offers frontier-level coding at a fraction of the latency when compared to Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 across Terminal-Bench, SWE-Bench, and CursorBench.
“With Composer 2.5, Cursor gives us the most cost-competitive model at the frontier of intelligence.”

“For businesses moving from tokenmaxxing to valuemaxxing, Composer 2.5 could not have come at a better time.”

“Been driving Composer 2.5 for like 3 hours straight and absolutely holy smokes, it is so freaking good!”

“Cursor's new Composer 2.5 takes third on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index and is ~10-60x lower cost than the higher-effort Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 variants above it.This release puts Composer among the leading coding agent models.”

“Continuing to test, test, and test some more with Composer 2.5, and I'm getting more and more impressed with each test run.The planning mode really continues to impress me, it is better than Opus 4.7 at planning imo, while being both faster, and using a fraction of the tokens.”

“Cursor with Composer 2.5 is very cheap and strong: around 8× cheaper than Claude Code and Codex, and scores higher than open-weight models!”

Composer 2.5 is built on the same open-source checkpoint as Composer 2, Moonshot's Kimi K2.5.
Together with SpaceXAI, we're training a significantly larger model from scratch, using 10x more total compute. With Colossus 2's million H100-equivalents and our combined data and training techniques, we expect this to be a major leap in model capability.
(Above) Composer 2.5 is built on an open base with proprietary intelligence: 85% of its compute goes into additional training and RL, rapidly improving its speed, efficiency, and coding abilities.
(Above) Composer 2.5 reaches top CursorBench 3.2 scores while using less cost, fewer tokens, and fewer steps per task.
| Model | Score | CostCost / task | TokensTokens / task | StepsSteps / task |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Composer 2.5 | 56.1% | $0.44 | 14,286 | 33 |
(Above) Composer 2.5 reaches top CursorBench 3.2 scores while using less cost, fewer tokens, and fewer steps per task.
| Model | Score | CostCost / task | TokensTokens / task | StepsSteps / task |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Composer 2.5 | 56.1% | $0.44 | 14,286 | 33 |